NigeriaPolls · National Index
Security Perception Index
Measuring how safe Nigerians feel across all 36 states and the FCT. Updated monthly from a nationally representative sample of 15,600 respondents. Security is not merely a matter of crime statistics or military operations—it is a lived experience that shapes where families choose to live, where businesses invest, and whether children can walk to school without fear. The Security Perception Index captures this subjective reality, complementing official data with the voices of ordinary Nigerians. In a country where insecurity has displaced millions, disrupted agriculture, and strained inter-communal relations, understanding how people feel is as important as counting incidents. This index tracks those feelings over time and across space, providing an early-warning system for deteriorating conditions and a benchmark for measuring recovery.
Current Score
Last updated: July 2026
Sample: 15,600 respondents
Geography
State Rankings: Security Perception Score
Nigeria's security landscape is deeply uneven. While the South-West and FCT record moderate-to-high confidence, the North-East and North-West remain mired in low security perception driven by insurgency, banditry, and ethno-religious conflict. The table below ranks all 37 states by their current Security Perception Index score.
| Rank | State | Score | Change | Safety Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FCT | 52.1 | +2.3 | Moderate |
| 2 | Lagos | 48.3 | +1.1 | Moderate |
| 3 | Ogun | 46.5 | +0.8 | Moderate |
| 4 | Ekiti | 45.2 | +0.5 | Moderate |
| 5 | Osun | 44.8 | +0.3 | Low |
| 6 | Ondo | 43.6 | +0.9 | Low |
| 7 | Oyo | 42.9 | -0.2 | Low |
| 8 | Kwara | 41.3 | +0.4 | Low |
| 9 | Delta | 40.7 | +1.2 | Low |
| 10 | Edo | 40.1 | +0.6 | Low |
| 11 | Akwa Ibom | 39.5 | +0.3 | Low |
| 12 | Enugu | 38.8 | -0.1 | Low |
| 13 | Anambra | 38.2 | +0.5 | Low |
| 14 | Abia | 37.6 | +0.2 | Low |
| 15 | Cross River | 37.1 | +0.7 | Low |
| 16 | Rivers | 36.4 | -0.4 | Low |
| 17 | Bayelsa | 35.9 | +0.1 | Low |
| 18 | Imo | 35.3 | -0.8 | Low |
| 19 | Ebonyi | 34.7 | +0.3 | Very Low |
| 20 | Plateau | 33.8 | -1.2 | Very Low |
| 21 | Taraba | 32.5 | -0.5 | Very Low |
| 22 | Benue | 31.9 | -0.3 | Very Low |
| 23 | Nasarawa | 31.2 | +0.2 | Very Low |
| 24 | Kogi | 30.6 | -0.6 | Very Low |
| 25 | Adamawa | 29.8 | -0.9 | Very Low |
| 26 | Gombe | 28.4 | -0.4 | Very Low |
| 27 | Bauchi | 27.9 | -0.2 | Very Low |
| 28 | Kebbi | 26.5 | -0.7 | Very Low |
| 29 | Sokoto | 25.8 | -1.1 | Very Low |
| 30 | Jigawa | 24.3 | -0.5 | Critical |
| 31 | Kano | 23.7 | -0.8 | Critical |
| 32 | Katsina | 22.1 | -1.4 | Critical |
| 33 | Niger | 19.5 | -2.0 | Critical |
| 34 | Kaduna | 18.2 | -1.8 | Critical |
| 35 | Yobe | 16.8 | -0.6 | Critical |
| 36 | Zamfara | 15.1 | -2.3 | Critical |
| 37 | Borno | 12.4 | -1.5 | Critical |
Understanding the Geography of Fear
The Security Perception Index reveals a Nigeria divided into distinct security zones. The South-West bloc—comprising Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Osun, Ekiti, and Ondo—forms the most confident region, with all six states scoring above 42. This reflects a combination of factors: lower exposure to insurgent violence, functioning state and non-state security architectures (including Amotekun in the South-West), and a degree of economic dynamism that provides livelihood alternatives to crime. The South-West also benefits from a relatively cohesive media environment that reports security issues without amplifying panic, and from traditional rulers who retain significant authority in local dispute resolution.
The FCT's top ranking (52.1) is somewhat anomalous given its proximity to Kaduna, a state in the bottom five. Abuja benefits from concentrated federal security assets, extensive CCTV coverage in the city centre, and a predominantly professional population with greater access to private security. However, the +2.3 monthly change also reflects recent improvements in perimeter security and intelligence-led operations that have pre-empted several planned attacks. The FCT's security model—heavy surveillance, rapid response units, and strict vehicular checkpoints—is resource-intensive and cannot be easily replicated across all states, but it demonstrates what is possible when security is prioritized.
The North-East remains the most traumatized region. Borno (12.4) and Yobe (16.8) have endured over a decade of Boko Haram violence, displacing millions and destroying trust in public institutions. While military operations have recaptured territory, the psychological scars persist. IDP camps, where many youth still live, report some of the lowest security perceptions in the country. Rebuilding confidence here will require not just security but also restoration of livelihoods, education, and community structures. The return of IDPs to their home communities—often encouraged by government—has been halting because many find their homes destroyed and their farmland occupied. Without a comprehensive reintegration programme, security perception in the North-East will remain depressed regardless of military gains.
The North-West presents a different but equally grave challenge. Zamfara (15.1), Kaduna (18.2), and Niger (19.5) are beset by banditry—organized criminal gangs that raid villages, kidnap for ransom, and disrupt farming. Unlike the ideologically driven insurgency in the North-East, banditry is fuelled by economic grievance, cattle-rustling networks, and porous borders. Community-led vigilante groups have emerged in response, but their relationship with formal security forces is often tense. In Zamfara, vigilantes have been accused of extrajudicial killings, while in Kaduna, they have been drawn into ethno-religious conflicts that complicate their neutrality. The banditry crisis also has a climate dimension: desertification and shrinking grazing land have pushed herders southward into farming communities, creating resource competition that criminal networks exploit.
For state-specific polling data, visit our polls directory or learn more about NigeriaPolls.
Data Analysis
Incident Correlation Analysis
How do different types of security incidents affect public perception? Our correlation analysis maps reported incident rates against state-level perception scores, revealing which threats most severely erode confidence.
Kidnapping
Armed robbery
Communal clashes
Banditry
Insurgency
Cyber fraud
Key Findings from the Correlation Data
Insurgency produces the most devastating impact on security perception: states affected by insurgency score an average of 15.2, despite relatively low incident rates per 100,000 population. This is because insurgent attacks are highly visible, indiscriminate, and accompanied by mass displacement and property destruction. The psychological impact extends far beyond direct victims, creating a climate of fear that paralyses economic and social activity. In Borno, even residents of relatively safe areas like Maiduguri city centre report low security perception because they have family members in IDP camps, have witnessed attacks, or fear that violence could spread.
Banditry follows closely, with a correlation perception score of 18.4. Banditry is particularly corrosive because it targets rural farming communities—the backbone of the northern economy. When farmers cannot plant or harvest due to fear of attack, food insecurity rises, and youth are drawn into either bandit gangs or displacement. The geographic concentration of banditry in the North-West and parts of the North-Central means that entire states are perceived as no-go areas. Schools have been especially hard hit, with mass abductions of students creating a generation of disrupted education and traumatized children. The economic cost is staggering: the World Bank estimates that banditry in the North-West alone has reduced agricultural output by 20–30%.
Kidnapping, despite a high incident rate (4.2 per 100,000), produces a somewhat higher perception score of 22.1. This may seem counterintuitive, but it reflects the fact that kidnapping is increasingly commercialized and geographically dispersed. Victims are often released after ransom payment, and urban residents may feel somewhat insulated compared to rural communities facing banditry. Nevertheless, the normalization of kidnapping is itself a troubling indicator of state fragility. The kidnapping industry has become professionalized, with networks spanning state borders and involving negotiators, logistics providers, and money launderers. The recent targeting of university students and railway passengers has broadened the sense of vulnerability beyond the elite.
Armed robbery, with an incident rate of 6.8 per 100,000, correlates with a perception score of 25.3. Unlike banditry or insurgency, armed robbery is primarily an urban phenomenon, concentrated in Lagos, Port Harcourt, Kano, and Abuja. Its impact on perception is moderated by the fact that urban residents have adapted: they avoid certain areas, travel in groups at night, and rely on private security. The commodification of safety—gated estates, Uber rides instead of walking, armed response services—creates a two-tier security environment where the wealthy feel safer than the poor. This inequality in security access is a growing concern that the index captures through its socio-economic breakdowns.
Cyber fraud, with the highest incident rate (8.4 per 100,000), is associated with the highest perception score (35.6). This reflects both the lower physical danger of cybercrime and the fact that it is perceived as a problem that primarily affects wealthier, digitally connected individuals. However, as digital financial services expand, cyber fraud may increasingly impact ordinary Nigerians and erode trust in the digital economy. Already, we see rising reports of mobile money fraud and phishing scams targeting small traders and pensioners. The perception gap between cyber fraud and violent crime may narrow in coming years as digital financial inclusion deepens.
Trend Analysis
12-Month Security Perception Trend
After hitting a low of 28.4 in December 2025, the Security Perception Index has climbed steadily to 31.2 in July 2026. This seven-month improvement represents the longest sustained recovery since 2023, though the absolute level remains critically low.
Drivers of the Recent Improvement
The steady rise from 28.4 to 31.2 over seven months is driven by several converging factors. First, the Nigerian military has intensified air and ground operations in Zamfara, Katsina, and Kaduna, destroying bandit camps and rescuing kidnapped victims. While these operations have not eliminated banditry, they have disrupted the operational tempo of criminal groups and provided temporary relief to some communities. The use of aerial surveillance and drone technology has improved targeting, reducing collateral damage compared to earlier campaigns.
Second, several states have formalized community vigilante networks and equipped them with communication tools and stipends. In Zamfara, the Yan Sakai vigilantes have been partially integrated into state security structures, improving coordination with the police and military. Similar arrangements exist in Katsina and Niger. These hybrid security models are controversial—human rights organizations have documented abuses by vigilantes—but they have undoubtedly contributed to a sense of local agency and protection. The challenge is to professionalize these groups, hold them accountable, and prevent them from becoming new sources of violence.
Third, the relative lull in Boko Haram activity in Borno and Yobe during the first half of 2026 has allowed some IDPs to return to their homes, albeit cautiously. The Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) faction has been preoccupied with internal rivalries, reducing the frequency of large-scale attacks. However, this respite may be temporary; historical patterns suggest that militant groups regroup during quiet periods. The Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF) has also stepped up cross-border operations with Cameroon, Chad, and Niger, limiting the movement of insurgents across the Lake Chad basin.
Fourth, improved intelligence sharing between the Department of State Services (DSS), the police, and the military has pre-empted several high-profile kidnapping plots, particularly in the FCT and along major highways. The establishment of the Nigeria Police Force's Special Intervention Squad in Abuja has been particularly well received by residents. Additionally, the deployment of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) to protect schools in bandit-prone areas has reassured parents, though the coverage remains patchy.
Finally, there is a psychological dimension to the improvement. After years of deteriorating security, any stabilization feels like progress. The index captures this relief effect: even modest reductions in attack frequency can produce disproportionate improvements in sentiment because they break the cycle of fatalism. However, this also means that the improvement is fragile. A single high-profile attack—a school abduction, a bombing, or a political assassination—could erase months of gains. For ongoing updates, follow our latest polls and methodology pages.
Methodology
How We Measure Security Perception
The Security Perception Index is grounded in rigorous survey methodology. We combine probability sampling, multi-language interviewing, and transparent weighting to ensure our findings are representative and replicable.
Sampling Frame
Our sampling frame is derived from the most recent National Population Commission census projections, stratified by state, urban/rural classification, and household density. We select enumeration areas with probability proportional to size, then randomly select households within each area. One adult respondent aged 18 or older is interviewed per household. The current sample of 15,600 respondents achieves a margin of error of ±0.8 percentage points at the 95% confidence level for national estimates, and ±2.5 points for state-level estimates. This precision is essential for detecting changes in security perception, which can shift rapidly in response to events.
Survey Administration
Interviews are conducted primarily face-to-face (70%) by trained field enumerators using tablet-based questionnaires. In areas with limited access due to security concerns, we supplement with mobile phone interviews (25%) and, where feasible, online panels (5%). All questionnaires are available in English, Hausa, Yoruba, and Igbo. Interviewers receive specialized training on sensitive security questioning to minimize social desirability bias and ensure respondent safety. In conflict-affected areas, we employ local enumerators who understand the context and can navigate security risks. We also conduct interviews in private settings to protect respondents from potential reprisals.
Weighting and Adjustment
Raw survey data are weighted to match national demographic benchmarks for age, gender, state, and urban/rural distribution. We apply additional non-response adjustments for states with higher refusal rates, typically those experiencing acute security incidents at the time of fieldwork. Outlier responses are flagged and verified through callback procedures. The complete weighting scheme and adjustment parameters are published in our monthly technical report. We also correct for mode effects: respondents interviewed by phone sometimes report higher security perception than those interviewed face-to-face, possibly because phone interviews occur in less private settings where respondents may be reluctant to criticize security forces.
Index Composition
The Security Perception Index aggregates five equally weighted dimensions: Personal Safety (feelings of safety in daily life), Property Security (confidence in protection of assets), Law Enforcement Trust (belief in police and security agency effectiveness), Trend Perception (whether security is improving or worsening), and Geographic Confidence (comfort travelling and living in different areas). Each dimension is measured by 3–5 validated survey items, normalized to a 0–100 scale, and combined into the headline score. The instrument was developed through a rigorous pilot phase in 2020, involving cognitive testing, focus groups, and statistical validation. We periodically review and update the questionnaire to ensure it remains relevant as the security landscape evolves.
Related
Latest Security-Focused Polls
Dive deeper into Nigeria's security landscape with our latest surveys on policing, conflict, and safety.
Public Trust in the Nigeria Police Force 2026
A survey of 10,000 Nigerians on their confidence in the police. Finds modest improvement in urban areas but persistent mistrust in the North-Central and North-West.
Read moreFarmer-Herder Conflict Impact Survey
How has the farmer-herder crisis affected livelihoods and migration? This poll of 7,800 respondents in Plateau, Benue, and Nasarawa documents displacement, crop loss, and inter-community tensions.
Read moreLagos & Abuja Night Safety Audit
Do Nigerians feel safe moving at night in the two largest cities? This spatially mapped survey identifies safe corridors, danger hotspots, and the role of street lighting and police visibility.
Read moreFAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about the Security Perception Index, its methodology, and how to interpret the data.
What is the Security Perception Index?
The Security Perception Index is a composite metric developed by NigeriaPolls to measure how safe Nigerians feel in their daily lives. It captures subjective security—the personal sense of safety—rather than objective crime statistics alone. The index is scored on a 0–100 scale, where higher values indicate greater perceived safety. It draws from a nationally representative sample and is updated monthly. The index encompasses assessments of personal safety, property security, confidence in law enforcement, and perceptions of trend direction. We distinguish between objective security (measured by crime rates and incident data) and subjective security (measured by feelings and expectations) because the two can diverge significantly. A community with low crime but high fear may underinvest in economic activity, while a community with moderate crime but strong social cohesion may thrive. The Security Perception Index captures this subjective dimension, which is often the more powerful driver of behaviour.
How is the Security Perception Index calculated?
The index is constructed from five sub-dimensions, each weighted equally at 20%: Personal Safety (feelings of safety at home, work, and in public spaces), Property Security (confidence that homes and businesses are protected from theft or damage), Law Enforcement Trust (belief that police and security agencies respond effectively to incidents), Trend Perception (whether respondents feel security is improving, stable, or deteriorating), and Geographic Confidence (comfort travelling within and outside one's state). Each dimension is measured by 3–5 validated survey items on a five-point Likert scale, normalized to a 0–100 scale, and combined into the headline score. The Personal Safety dimension includes questions about fear of walking alone at night, comfort letting children play outside, and anxiety about harassment or assault. Property Security covers home burglary risk, business protection, and vehicle safety. Law Enforcement Trust assesses response time expectations, fairness of treatment, and corruption perceptions. Trend Perception captures directional judgments: whether respondents believe security is getting better, worse, or staying the same. Geographic Confidence measures willingness to travel to other states and comfort living in current location.
Which states are the safest in Nigeria?
The FCT leads the Security Perception Index with a score of 52.1, benefiting from heightened federal security presence, gated communities, and relatively rapid emergency response times. Lagos follows at 48.3, where private security infrastructure and neighbourhood vigilance compensate for high population density. Ogun (46.5), Ekiti (45.2), and Osun (44.8) round out the top five, reflecting the relative calm of South-Western states. It is important to note that 'safest' here refers to perceived safety; objective crime rates may differ. Lagos, for instance, has higher absolute crime volumes than most states due to its population size, but its residents feel relatively secure because policing is more visible and emergency services more accessible. The FCT's score has improved significantly (+2.3) following enhanced intelligence operations and the deployment of the Special Intervention Squad. Ogun benefits from its proximity to Lagos—many residents commute and expect similar security standards—while Ekiti and Osun profit from lower population density and stronger traditional governance structures that mediate local disputes before they escalate.
Which states feel the least secure?
Borno ranks lowest at 12.4, still heavily affected by Boko Haram insurgency and its legacy of displacement and trauma. Zamfara (15.1) and Yobe (16.8) follow, with Zamfara particularly afflicted by banditry and cattle rustling that has made rural life precarious. Kaduna (18.2) and Niger (19.5) complete the bottom five. Kaduna's low score reflects both ethno-religious tensions in the southern half and banditry in the north, while Niger has seen an expansion of bandit activities from neighbouring Zamfara. Borno's score, while catastrophically low, actually represents an improvement from the 2016–2018 period when the index first began tracking, suggesting that some normalization has occurred despite continued violence. Zamfara's -2.3 monthly change is the largest decline recorded in the current cycle, driven by a surge in mass kidnappings from schools and rural markets. Yobe's score is pulled down by spillover attacks from Borno and the slow pace of reconstruction in communities devastated during the peak insurgency years.
How does the index correlate with actual crime incidents?
The Security Perception Index shows a strong inverse correlation with reported incident rates. States with high banditry, insurgency, or kidnapping consistently score below 30. However, perception also diverges from objective data in important ways. Lagos, for example, has significant absolute crime volumes due to its population size, yet its perception score (48.3) is high because incidents are concentrated in specific areas and emergency response is relatively effective. Conversely, some states with lower absolute crime rates score poorly because incidents are highly visible or occur in areas where no help is expected. The index thus captures both reality and the psychology of safety. A fascinating finding from our research is the 'media effect': states with high national media coverage of insecurity score lower than statistically similar states that receive less coverage. Borno's score is amplified by its status as a symbol of national security failure, while Kogi— which faces serious criminal threats—scores marginally better partly because it receives less sustained media attention. This means that perception is not just a function of lived experience but also of narrative and information environment.
Is security perception improving in Nigeria?
The national Security Perception Index has risen from 29.8 to 31.2 over the past twelve months, suggesting a modest but meaningful improvement in how safe Nigerians feel. This uptick correlates with increased military operations in the North-West, the establishment of community vigilante networks in several states, and a slight reduction in high-profile kidnapping incidents in early 2026. However, the index remains in the 'low confidence' zone (below 40), and the improvement is fragile. Any resurgence of major attacks could quickly reverse the trend. Sustained investment in policing, intelligence, and conflict prevention is needed to consolidate these gains. The improvement is not evenly distributed: the FCT, Lagos, and Ogun have driven most of the national gain, while Zamfara, Kaduna, and Niger have continued to deteriorate. This divergence means that the average Nigerian feels slightly safer, but millions in the North-West and North-Central feel more threatened than ever. The seven-month streak of improvement (December 2025 to July 2026) is the longest positive run since 2022, but it started from a very low base. For the trend to be meaningful, the index needs to sustain levels above 35 for at least six consecutive months.
Stay Safe, Stay Informed
Subscribe to the NigeriaPolls Security Brief for monthly updates on the Security Perception Index, incident analysis, and expert commentary on Nigeria's evolving security landscape.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our Privacy Policy.
Explore More
Related Indices & Resources
Youth Hope Index
Track optimism and future confidence among Nigerian youth. Explore age and employment breakdowns, state rankings, and 12-month trends.
View indexEconomic Confidence Index
Measure consumer and business sentiment across Nigeria. Explore inflation expectations, spending plans, and sectoral outlooks.
View indexState Polling Hub
Browse polls and surveys by Nigerian state. Compare public opinion across all 36 states and the FCT on issues that matter.
Browse states